Anonymous yet personal, this Blog chronicles
the daily events and musings of Jim.
It provides an easy way for his friends and family to check in on him,
and serves as a online repository for his random
thoughts, kaleidoscopic flashbacks, and writings on an array of diverse topics.
“Deconstructing Jim” is simply here to
entertain you, but not intended for college credit.

A little about me

My photo
Chapel Hill, NC, United States

Labels

Art (27) Birthday (3) Book Review (4) Boston (39) CD Review (2) Celebrations (10) Concert Review (39) Dreams (4) Education (5) Employment (11) Factoid (26) Family (28) Flashback (40) Flying (6) Food (22) Friends (8) Fun (14) Health (3) Holland (5) Movies (9) Music (261) Nature (12) NY (8) Obit (8) Poetry (6) Random thoughts (99) Science (12) Sports (6) Tech (34) Travel (27) Weird stuff (28) Woodwind Quintet (1)
Showing posts with label Book Review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Book Review. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Music Composition for Dummies

In our age of "better faster cheaper" education, a niche publishing market has flourished.

Wiley Publishing Inc. has been very successful with their for Dummies books. A search on Amazon.com turned up 3,297 titles in the series. Self-admitted Dummies can learn the basics about String Theory, Global Warming, Space Exploration, Auto Repair, Cloud Computing, Knitting, Japanese, and Second Life (just to name a few popular subject areas).

The "for Dummies" series is positioned to provide practical information presented in a consistent easy-to-read style. The publishers' trademark is a catchy black-and-yellow paperback cover and silly titles. But in general these books do provide some useful information about topical or trendy subjects and aim to explain in common language concepts that are often complicated and intimidating to average people. These books strive to be user-friendly, concise, and up-to-date.

You can imagine that it caught my attention when I discovered Music Composition For Dummies while browsing in the bookstore.



First, I was a little surprised that there is a market for this topic. But given the societal gravitation toward quick and easy self-improvement, I could see that some people would want to learn "just enough" about music composition to get by. Perhaps there are busy people who want to compose, but can't take lessons, make the time commitment to learn the craft, or just want to learn enough to talk semi-intelligently about the subject. I see no fault in that.

However, as someone who has studied music composition for the better part of a lifetime, I was impressed with the goal set forth by the authors to train the pure novice (or "Dummie") on the subject in the span of a few hundred pages of written text.

So many great musical minds over the centuries have attempted to write books about musical composition - from C.P.E. Bach to Arnold Schoenberg - and all of them have come up short in one way or another. For me, it has always been an impossible topic to write about, and the process of learning to compose music is one that takes many years of study, very hard work, and a broad understanding of an encyclopedia of technical and cultural details. Frankly, I don't believe there is a quick fix or shortcut to the traditional methods of study.

Music Composition For Dummies (not to be confused with The Complete Idiot's Guide to Music Composition by Michael Miller - also by Wiley Publishing) sets the bar rather high. The publisher promises that the book "demystifies the process of composing music..." Authors Scott Jarrett and Holly Day have their work cut out for them, and they do their best to explain a very complicated subject to the absolute beginner.

The book is organized around the following subsections:
Preserve and organize your musical ideas
Work with established chord progressions or create your own
Develop great rhythms
Select the right instruments
Find melodies in your head, your instrument, and the world around you
Use major and minor scales
Work with modes and moods
Build melodic motifs and phrases
Use the circle of fifths to harmonize
Write for multiple voices
Make a demo recording


The authors' section headings are written like the job-description area of a good resume, with lots of "action words" and a positive sales pitch. While I don't that style of writing, the topics are quite appropriate and applicable to the making a musical work.

From reading other reviews of the book, I gather that there are some qualms and quibbles about the wording and technical details within the text. For example, on page 148, regarding the development section of the sonata form the authors write: "The development often sounds like it belongs in an entirely different piece of music altogether -- it is usually in a different key and may have a different time signature than the exposition."

Here is where the danger lies...

When one over-simplifies any subject, misconceptions and misunderstanding can arise. Sonata form is one of the more complicated subjects in Western music, and it is very difficult to adequately grasp the concept of Sonata-Allegro form without studying a body of representative pieces that exist in the repertory. Renowned musicologist, scholar, and pianist Charles Rosen wrote an award winning book about this very topic, and even his rather extensive monograph will not serve as a definitive or complete discussion on the subject. Used in isolation without the experience of extensive musical examples, books alone can not provide a full and necessary understanding of the complex art of musical composition.

Albert Einstein said, "Things should be made as simple as possible, but not any simpler." The same principle holds true in the field of music composition. Charles Wuorinen's book "Simple Composition" is actually rather complex. Given the complexity of musical language, it can't be reduced beyond a certain level.

While I commend authors Scott Jarrett and Holly Day for their admirable effort to explain the art of musical composition to non-experts in just a few hundred pages, I don't think they ever had a chance to succeed in their task. However, given the constraints that they had to work within, it is not necessarily a bad book. However, Music Composition For Dummies is a book that I would never recommend in the context of serious study or professional musical training.

I was curious to learn if the authors were professional composers - not necessarily university professors with academic credentials - but skilled musicians who compose for a living. I was not able to establish that fact. I do suspect that the authors are professional freelance writers who have published other "for Dummies" books on diverse topics and various user-friendly "how to" publications.

It all goes back to my original point that consumers want their knowledge and skills "better faster cheaper." Why invest decades of time and countless dollars pursuing a traditional path of music education when you can purchase a book for under $20 and learn enough to get by? Presumably anyone who reads the book could call themselves a composer and impress others with their cursory knowledge of the subject at cocktail parties and the like.

In my humble opinion, books such as those in the "for Dummies" series perpetuate the false notion that there is an easy way or short cut to learning complicated things. While there is nothing wrong about writing an introductory book about an advanced topic, marketing it as "A Reference for the Rest of Us!" beguiles the subject matter.

It also insults the reader to make the assumption that they start from a position of abject ignorance and incompetence. I don't believe that book titles using the D-word are humorous or cute. It is now clear from recent discoveries using fMRIs in brain science that all humans are genetically pre-wired with innate musical ability and come to the table with amazing skills of aural perception and cognitive processing capability. Wouldn't it be better to start with that positive assumption rather than assign demeaning labels to interested students or beginners?

I don't get it.

Perhaps I should write my own book.


---------------
Music Composition for Dummies
by Scott Jarrett and Holly Day
Wiley Publishing, Inc. 2008
Hoboken, NJ
ISBN-10: 0470224215
ISBN-13: 9780470224212
Paperback: 360 pages

Links:

http://www.amazon.com/Simple-Composition-Charles-Wuorinen/dp/product-description/0938856065

-----------------

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

A silly dream...

It’s now about twenty minutes after five in the morning. A foot of snow lays softly on the ground beyond my window, and it’s dark and cold outside. The day is about to begin, but for now there is a moment of silence. It’s January 20th. It’s going to be a historic day as our 44th President takes office in a few hours.


I am writing this shortly after I woke from a dream. It proved impossible to go back to sleep, but I need to tell my story. Sitting at my computer, restless, Microsoft Word beckons me to tell it about the event that just transpired.

It began like other dreams, a confusing hodge-podge of unrelated surrealistic and random events in serial succession, none of which make much sense of all. But then I found myself lost in an unknown urban setting – the bowels of a modern city – a hotel I think. After wandering through a maze of underground hallways and tunnels, I came through a door and exited up into the retail space of a large bookstore. It’s not Barnes and Noble, but a bookstore that sells used books - perhaps Powell’s in Portland, Oregon where I visited on vacation a few years back.

Miraculously, I found myself in the music section of the voluminous bookstore. This is not unusual since I am typically drawn to used bookstores to explore rare and out-of-print editions about my discipline: Music Composition and Theory. I was immediately drawn to one book in particular with a red cover, and pulled it off the shelf. I observe that it is dog-eared, but in good shape and I know what it is immediately. When I open the jacket, I see right off the bat that it had been my book. It still bares my name written in the inside cover, and still contains my carefully written annotations and comments.


The book in the dream was “Serial Composition” by Reginald Smith Brindle, a British composer who’s work was published by Oxford University Press in 1966.








He was an expert on the music of 20th-century Italian composers such as Luigi Dallapiccola, Ildebrando Pizzetti, and Bruno Bartolozzi, and had studied with all of them. Smith Brindle died in 1993 at the age of 86.



I was puzzled how my copy of “Serial Composition” had fallen into the hands of someone else, since I had purchased it decades ago for what was then a hefty price: $6.00. The subsequent owners had apparently added their own names and annotations in the years following my stewardship of the book. I looked to see who they were, and what they had written, but I did not recognize any of them. One owner had written his name in blue ink on the top right corner of the outside cover, although it was vague and blurred from the age of time.

As with many of my books, this one has a unique history, insider anecdotes, and personal associations from the youth of my student days. It had acquired the stains of use and the dust of many years on the shelves from a series of run-down apartments – including a period tucked away in storage between homes.

I purchased the book brand new when I was a year or two out of high school, but referred to it sporadically through years of college and graduate school. At that time practical “how-to” textbooks or technical field-guides about how to write 12-tone music were scant - at least until the American composer Charles Wuorinen published his “Simple Composition” in 1979. “Simple Composition” turned out to be not so simple, and it is just as biased and inane as Smith Brindle’s “Serial Composition.” With the wisdom of 20-20 hindsight, writing any book about the act of composition is impossible, and writing an aesthetically-neutral book about serial composition is just as futile. Nevertheless, both of those books made it to my personal collection of odd-ball artifacts concerning this obscure little corner of the musical universe. I have an entire room filled with out-of-print and out-of-use tomes on modern music and contemporary music theory. It’s a treasure trove of now-historic musical relics.

On little anecdote related to “Serial Composition” dates back to a colloquium that occurred at Brandeis for the graduate students studying composition in the early 80s. Composer Nicola LeFanu, a professor at King’s College London, Oxford educated, and a practicing a serialist, was invited to speak. Her music was familiar to me from her stint at Harvard on a Harkness fellowship in the early 70s because the new music group Collage played one of her works. Only a few faculty members and students made it to the colloquium, but I recall that professors Marty Boykan and Conrad Pope were present. At one point during her impromptu talk, LeFanu took a swipe at “Simple Composition” - the Wuorinen book. I forget precisely what it was that she said, but it was disparaging and contained an overtone of British superiority. With the arrogant over-confidence of a graduate student, I returned the torpedo with the reply, “Well, the Smith Brindle book sucks too.” Everyone got my joke.

In the dream I gaze at the book that I had formerly owned in amazement, but someone comes up to me, sees what I’m reading, and immediately attempts to grab it out of my hands. He’s a young man, has dark hair, a British accent, and is muttering, “I must have that book.” I hold it tight in my grasp, but he is persistent, undeterred, and appears unstable. I assured him that I’ve read it cover-to-cover many times, know its contents, and would be willing to give it to him if he told me why he wants the book so badly. The man can’t make his case. He’s confused and continues to forcibly grab it out of my hands. We engage in physical combat: mano a mano.

I woke up disoriented, covered head to toe with the moisture of perspiration, yet half-asleep. Still in an adrenaline rush, I consciously wondered if I had in fact lost my old book to the used bookstore. I glanced at the alarm clock on my bedside table but all I saw was the LED flashing in red and stuck at 3:26 AM. The electrical power had gone off briefly during the night. Everyone in the house was fast asleep.

I walked over to the adjoining room where I keep all of my music theory books, the flipped on the light. The room is filled to the brim with musical treatises – most of the brainy 12-tone-influenced classics: including “Basic Atonal Theory” by John Rahn, “Post Tonal Theory” by Joseph N. Straus, “Serial Composition and Atonality” by George Perle, “Composition with Pitch-Classes” by Robert D. Morris, “Generalized Musical Intervals and Transformations” by David Lewin, “The Structure of Atonal Music” by Allen Forte, and the pioneering work by Howard Hanson published in 1960: “Harmonic Materials of Modern Music.”

I search through the walls of shelves for the bright red Smith Brindle book. It should be easy to find because of it color and characteristic canvas binding. I can’t find it. It’s not where it should be. Still groggy from my dream, I begin to wonder if the dream could be true. How could someone have gotten their hands on my book? Did I misplace it somewhere in my travels? Did I lend it to someone? Finally I find it hidden behind a front layer of books on the outer rim of the shelf. Speaking silently to myself so as to not wake members of my family who are still fast asleep, I utter “Ah ha, Smith Brindle is safe and intact!” All of my original notes written in pencil scribbled 35 years ago are there too. I had written my annotations very lightly as not to damage the book for the rightful next owner, whoever that may be. The book will survive longer than I. This copy of Smith Brindle’s “Serial Composition” will live in perpetuity.



Dreams are only informative if we listen to their message. You don’t have to be Dr. Freud to interpret my dream and get a sense about what the book represents to me. I’ll leave the analysis to you.

Feeling a sense of relief after finding the book, my next urgent stop was the bathroom. I did what most old men have to do at various times throughout the night… pee.


Links:
http://www.powells.com/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reginald_Smith_Brindle

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicola_LeFanu

------------

Thursday, January 8, 2009

Book Review: Hallelujah Junction

I just finished reading the new autobiography by the American composer John Adams entitled Hallelujah Junction – Composing an American Life.

There have been ample reviews of this recent book in the major press, and all I intend to do is add a few personal observations and comments to go along with the general praise and good will that Adams’ memoirs have already generated.

Even before Hallelujah Junction was published, I listened to Adams read a few chapters at his alma mater Harvard.

My blog has at times in the past year served as a soapbox for my views about the “ism” of minimalism, and I have oft railed against it as a musical trend that contradicts the way I hear and consequently write music. So it was much to my surprise that reading what Adams wrote about his career, formative years, and personal musical evolution resonated with me more that I would have expected given my admittedly anti-minimalist orientation.

His prose is not bad, clearly a by-product of an education well-rounded in the classics and humanities. The book would be satisfying to a lay reader not familiar with the cut-throat and aesthetically perverse world of contemporary music, but it also would be interesting to someone who works in music and is curious about the inside scoop.

Adams tells anecdotal tales about his youth and exploration of a wide-range of musical genres in the early chapters of the book, particularly about his undergraduate years at Harvard in the 60s and 70s. For example, like many in my generation, he had encounters with the Selective Service draft board during the Vietnam era after college. He writes eloquently about his teachers at Harvard. Knowing the context and having met a few of the individuals cited - Ivan Tcherepnin, Elliott Forbes, Leon Kirchner, Earl Kim, and Luise Vosgerchian – allowed me to relate to his writing in a direct and personal way (Regretably, all except Kirchner, have since passed away). Adams captures the late-60s to early 70s Boston-Cambridge cultural scene with a backdrop of nostalgia while possessing a sharp recollection with regard to the details of those years.

One question that comes to my mind is why would he write his autobiography at this point in his life? Adams, born in 1947, is a youthful 62 year old. He’s not yet retired or on Social Security, and must have a busy life fulfilling commissions and preparing for upcoming conducting engagements. My hunch is that the book was an opportunity for self-reflection about the rhapsodic life he has led as well as an opportunity to explain his unique perspective about a number of controversial and turbulent encounters throughout his jam-packed career. It may also present an opportunity to clarify the facts, such as the distinction between himself and a number of composers who go by the same namesake.

Among the details that I found interesting was that he gigged in and around Boston as a freelance clarinetist, and substituted for the BSO under Eric Leinsdorf. The last public concert that he recalls performing was at Brandeis, where he “played the tricky, rhythmically treacherous Sextet by Copland and had the pleasure of meeting its composer after the concert.” Copland was overhead commenting afterward in this thick Brooklyn accent, “Yeah, the kid knows his stuff.” I can clearly picture the scene in my mind and which Brandeis composer were present with exacting detail – even though I wasn’t yet in Boston.

The great adventure of his life really began at the age of 26 after he finished his Masters degree at Harvard and left the oppressive East Coast for an exotic foreign country: California. He and his first wife packed everything they owned into an unreliable Volkswagen Beetle and drove to the Wild West via the Trans-Canada highway passing through the Rockies on their way.

It’s comforting to read that even the most fortunate of composers have their ups-and-downs, dry periods, and feelings of self-doubt. Adams is frank in his book about the trials and tribulations of the American composer, which ain’t all curtain calls and inevitable hits. It’s a tough business, but somone’s gotta do it.

Adams ended up in Berkeley and after a year of bumming around. The composer found an apartment house to manage in exchange for reduced rent, and held the title of Assistant Building Manager. “With two degrees from Harvard University, I began my professional life at $4 an hour, cleaning kitchens and toilets and chasing dope dealers from the hallway and foyers of the building.” This keep him going for a year while he slowly acclimated to the culture of the local beatnik environ, although he fell into what seems to be a state of mild depression. Adams writes, “I soon found myself in a rut, sleeping late and at night drinking the local inexpensive wine that could be purchased by the gallon.”

But things improved… he landed a working-class minimum-wage job on the Oakland waterfront unloading huge containers at the docks while fantasizing about living “a double life as a proletarian worker during the day and avant-garde composer at night.” But at times, albeit reluctantly, he considered returning to Harvard to earn his PhD as a way to escape the drudgery his forty-six hour work week.

One day the phone rang. It was the personal manager of Leonard Bernstein with a personal message from the Maestro. The famous conductor/composer wanted to know if Adams would become his personal assistant – travel with him to Vienna and elsewhere. The manager said, “Lenny wants to know how you are. Are you still married? Yes? Well, give us a call if your situation changes.”

Adams continued to work on the Oakland waterfront – perhaps hearing in his head excerpts from Bernstein’s magnificent movie score from “On the Waterfront” as he unloaded cargo. Of course Lenny found other assistants, including my friend Peter H., a composer and hedge-fund manager, who wound up severing his professional services with Bernstein in moral outrage and disgust. It’s possible that Peter got a phone call from the (in)famous Maestro’s personal manager in 1971 right after Adams declined to take the assignment.

As luck would have it, Ivan Tcherepnin - his former professor at Harvard - called with an inside tip that the San Francisco Conservatory needed an instructor ASAP. It would also involve directing the new music concert series too. He got the job. No more slaving in the shipyard for Adams. Besides, his decrepit VW died. It was an omen.

It was serendipitous. If Tcherepnin had not called that afternoon, we may never have heard of the composer John Adams. Adams may have ended up as one of the many countless composers of that era who dissolved into the oblivion of obscurity. It was the first big break in a perfect storm of fortunate circumstances that would lead him down a road of career opportunities that are virtually unheard of in this profession. From his ten-year stint at the San Francisco conservatory, he gained the experience and connections needed to move on in his development as a composer. True, the San Francisco teaching position was but a mere stepping stone in the overall trajectory of his incredible career, but an important milestone nonetheless. And just as importantly, he grasped at the opportunity and used it to work hard at his craft, to network, and to grow.

One of the interesting threads in his autobiography is the theme about how a composer comes to find what they want to write after they “grow up.” Adams muses about his discovering Wagner on cassette tape in the Sierra foothills in 1976, “while still in the process of forming my own voice” at the ripe age if 29. Composers need time to mature. That’s one of the important messages of this book.

Of course there were many other important milestones along the way, and Adams has a unique sense and humbling perspective about the import of these acts of fortune – including his commission from the then obscure Dutch conductor Edo de Waart: the successor of Seiji Ozawa at the San Francisco Symphony. Adams writes, “I suddenly found that I’d had dropped in my lap a major commission from an ‘establishment’ arts organization to be premiered in a high-profile setting.”

The result of this commission was the work Harmonium for chorus and orchestra. The work was premiered at the new Davies Hall on April 15th, 1981 when Adams was 34 years old. He describes The tape of the first performance made the rounds, created a buzz, and the work ultimately received numerous additional performances (unlike most new works that are only played once – if at all). Harmonium was soon recorded by ECM Records. That project bred a relationship with Bob Hurwitz from Nonesuch Records that would thrive in years to come. Adams wrote that Nonesuch recorded and released virtually every one of his works since 1985. (There are currently three commercial recordings: ECM conducted by Edo de Waart, Telarc conducted by Robert Shaw, and Nonesuch conducted by John Adams).

The book if full of similar milestones and interesting stories about his encounters and collaborations with musicians, writers, directors, and the classical music establishment. It was fun to read about Adams and John Cage draining bottles of Vodka late into the night after a Soviet Composers Union meeting at the Hotel Leningrad during a residency where Adams had his Harmonielehre performed by the Lithuanian State Philharmonic Orchestra. Cage was a hero among the Soviets, who bathed themselves in his Zen-like answers to philosophical questions – even if the translation was questionable (at best).

I learned more about Adams the conductor, and he must be very skilled. At this point he has traveled the world and conducted the finest orchestras - not only in performances of his own music, but the scores of other contemporary American masters too: including Ives, Nancarrow, and Zappa. He has some very personal and astute observations about those composers, and how they influenced his compositional thought. For example, the software package known as Digital Performer can be used to expand or contract music into bigger or smaller intervals of time. He has made use of this digital music-processing technique extensively, but got the idea from the rhythmic inventiveness of Nancarrow (who he met in Berkeley California), Ives, and even Zappa.

And yet, with all of this success, there is something missing in the autobiography. It does not mention certain milestones that would have changed the life of many a composer. For instance, Adams won the prestigious Pulitzer Prize in music in 2003. In 2008 he received a Grawemeyer Foundation award – amounting to $200,000. He won several Grammy Awards, and is a recipient of the $100,000 Michael Ludwig Nemmers Prize in Musical Composition which includes a performance by the Chicago Symphony Orchestra and a residency at Northwestern University School of Music. Perhaps it was modesty, and the fact that this information can be easily gleamed from his website, but you would think that all of these events would be life-transforming and reaffirming to one’s mission. It’s a necessary and vital part of the story and deserves mention. There are many composers whose life would be changed for the better by receiving any of these honorary and/or monetary distinctions, and it is curious that Adams chooses not to even mention their existence in his book. (I remember the year that Adams won the Nemmers, since I formally nominated a former teacher of mine for that high-profile award. I still think that my nominee was deserving of the honor, and would have benefited from it greatly).

Another odd piece of omission is about his studies. The Encyclopedia Britannica states that Adams studied with Roger Sessions at Harvard, yet there is no mention of the distinguished teacher and composer anywhere in his autobiography. Roger Sessions is one of the major figures of American composition – a founding father so to speak. It would have been interesting to read about their interactions, and differences of opinion they may have had. But Adams is silent on this subject, for reasons unknown.

Among the things I enjoyed most in the book were reading about the real-world entanglements of work and life, about the struggles of creation, and his work with others on large projects such as operas and various stage-works. On page 221 he writes “Artistic collaboration is never easy. On occasion it has occurred to me that, next to double murder-suicide, it might be the most painful thing two people can do together.” He writes about setting text, and the different attributes between languages in a musical settings.

The formative list of renown conductors, musicians, and singers that Adams has worked with over the years is well documented in the book. I particularly like his antidotes about late mezzo soprano Lorraine Hunt Lieberson - who he first encountered as a violist playing in Shaker Loops with a Berkeley new music ensemble. “She would arrive sleep and sexy, hastily dressed, barely awake, totally alluring.” Later, when she was a superstar and rehearsing for the premiere of El Niño, there was an unfortunate air of stress between her and the conductor Kent Nagao. “Lorraine, also a native northern Californian [like Nagano], having known Kent since her early days as a violist in the Bay Area, had some issues adjusting to what she construed as Kent’s maestro demeanor. So there in Paris, on the stage of the Châtelet, those two former residents of Berkeley and San Francisco, now nearing the pinnacles of their international musical careers, butted heads as if they were still in high school.”

It does seem that Adams has a Schoenberg-complex. On page 128-129 he recants in vivid detail a nightmare that he had about the old man. Schoenberg was “like a brooding, egocentric father, impossible to please, he looked in my consciousness, sometimes as the embodiment of a mercurial creative force and other times as a lethal defoliant, ready to kill off any and all sprouts of life that might appear in its immediate range.” In the dream, Schoenberg approaches him in an overcoat and tries to abduct his infant children. Adams admires Schoenberg, and despises him too. The inner-conflict inspired Adams to compose his own Chamber Symphony which “went to the edge of comprehensibility and clarity.” He writes: “Like the Schoenberg Chamber Symphony, which also suffers from nearly insurmountable balance problems, my work is a virtual hive of contrapuntal activity. Scored for an ensemble of solo instruments that was similar to the Schoenberg with an additional keyboard sampler and drum set, it gives all players special moments to shine as soloists, often in melodic lines of finger-twisting complexity. A lot of gnarly music that I’d long had a fondness for…”

My brother-in-law Jan, a professional cellist in Amsterdam, confided to me that he had issues playing this work, saying that it is poorly orchestrated and individual parts get drowned out. Adams writes, as if in rebuttal to this criticism: “An inspired performance was both entertaining and breathtakingly virtuosic. But a bad performance – and I heard many – sounded like undifferentiated noise, fifteen instrumentalists loudly and aggressively riffing as if casually indifferent to one another.”

The book is roughly in chronological order, but also organized into chapters that focus on individual works or subjects of thought. Sometimes the writing double-backs on itself, and I lost track of dates and time. So many of his projects were multi-year events, so there is some overlap between chapters. I wish the book included an appendix with a complete chronological listing of his works as a point of reference.

In the final chapter – Garage Sale of the Mind – Adams tries to end on a positive note. It is a discussion about history, and questions if the concept of progress actually exists. He counters a point in the book Full House by Stephen Jay Gould comparing evolutionary science and cultural legend. Adams proposes that, “Rather than viewing ‘progress’ as the paradigm for novelty in the arts, we might be better advised to welcome the idea of ‘variation.’”

Now that I’ve read his autobiography, I intend to revisit his music. There certainly is plenty of it.

Halleluhjah Junction - Composing an American Life
by John Adams
Farrar, Straus and Giroux, copyright 2008
ISBN-13: 978-0-374-28115-1
ISBN-10: 0-374-28115-7

Links:
http://www.amazon.com/Hallelujah-Junction-Composing-American-Life/dp/0374281157/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1231391686&sr=1-1

-----------

Friday, November 7, 2008

Book Review: Historic Photos of Boston

In the three and a half decades since I moved to Boston, I've seen many changes to the city's landscape. The changes run deeper than the departure of jazz clubs Paul's Mall and The Jazz Workshop or favorite restaurants such as Ken's on Boylston Street.

Over the decades new skyscrapers have sprung up - not only in the financial district, but in historic Back Bay where the Prudential and John Hancock Tower had once symbolically stood as Beantown's sole tall buildings. The Hancock Tower, a 60-story modernest structure designed by I. M. Pei was nearing completion when I arrived in 1973, but it was also famous for its construction or design flaws: Large glass windows would spontaneously pop out in the wind and crash onto the busy streets far below. You can imagine the terror and concern this created in the Back Bay area and the attention it got in the media. Large pieces of plywood were temporarily hammered into place to replace glass that had fallen to the ground. Although you could see that a lot of plywood had replaced broken windows, to my knowledge no body was injured by falling glass.

http://architecture.about.com/library/bljohnhancocktower.htm

Cities are always evolving, and Boston is no exception. Even though I have witnessed enormous architectural change in the span of just a few decades, it is interesting to view the photographic record of a city over a much longer time period to get an even broader sense of this dramatic change. The impact on the urban landscape on our lives is far reaching and pervasive. It says legions about the culture and consciousness of a city's inhabitants.

My latest table book - Historic Photos of Boston - is an album of well-selected photographs that chronicle the history of Boston. The book is remarkable photographic record of the rapid changes in architecture that occurred in the city from the mid-nineteenth through to the mid-twentieth centuries. I am entranced by the story told by every photograph, each of which is dated and explained in captions that are painstakingly researched by the author - landmark preservationist Timothy Orwig. Most of the photos were obtained from the Print Department of the Boston Public Library. http://www.bpl.org/research/print/index.htm

The earliest photos in this volume, dating from about 1850, are ghost-like images of structures and a cityscape that no longer exist in my modern city - such as the Cathedral of the Holy Cross on Franklin Street which was built in 1800-03 by the important American architect: Charles Bulfinch. Bulfinch was a visionary, and as Commissioner of Public Building, he put his indelible stamp on not only Boston, but Washington D.C. where here designed the Capital building. He had studied in Europe and incorporated European ideas and concepts into his American projects. Among his many local architectural accomplishments are: Faneuil Hall, the Boston Common, and the Massachusetts State House. Photographs of most of these buildings are represented in the publication.

It's good that the camera was invented when it was, since many structures in Boston burned down in the Great Fire of 1872. That dreaded event consumed 776 buildings in a 60 acre area and changed the downtown area forever (Several photos in the book document this disaster).

As someone who did not move to Boston until the early 70's, it is fascinating to see what the city looked like long before my time. Yet there are many streets, parks, and structures that still exist today but stand in an entirely different context, such as historic Faneuil Hall and Quincy Market. Having lived in the North End for a number of years (see my blog post North End Stories dated 7/2/08), much of that neighborhood looks very similar to what we see in photos dating from the 1920s and beyond. For example the Paul Revere House in North Square is shown in the book in a photo taken in 1909, and amazingly it looks quite the same today! That wood building stands solidly as the oldest structure in Boston. It was built around 1680. http://www.paulreverehouse.org/

Also looking virtually unchanged compared to a photo in the book is the Union Oyster House restaurant - the oldest continuously operating restaurant in the nation! (btw, their New England clam chowder is superb). http://www.unionoysterhouse.com/

It's nice to see what the Cyclorama looked liked when it opened in 1884. Today this building is home of the Boston Center for the Arts in the South End. http://www.acmi.net.au/AIC/CYCLORAMA_BOSTON.html

The stylish Majestic Theatre is shown in a 1903 photo that reveals what it looked like in its' heyday. Originally designed as an opera house, it still functions as such and was beautifully restored by Emerson College in 1989. http://www.maj.org/historyindex.html

One thing that seems to have changed multiple times over the years is North Station on Causeway Street. A photograph from 1901 shows the massive Union Station (1894) which connected to several rail lines including the Lowell and Fitchburg systems. Union Station was leveled in 1927 to build North Station and the Boston Garden, which more recently was succeeded by the TD Banknorth Garden built over the tracks. Somehow the elegance and meaning of train stations as both a functional and symbolic port of entrance to the city has been lost in our current society. North Station today may be efficient, cost-effective, and functional, but it is also bland and without a soul. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Station

The facade of South Station on the other hand was maintained, and it looks much like it did in the 1901 photo in the book - although the elevated railway is long gone. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Station

Every city has its disasters, and one of Boston's worst occurred on January 19th, 1919 in the North End. It was the Great Molasses explosion that killed 21 and injured 150 . Several photographs in the book document the devastation, which was extensive as its 8-foot wave of molasses engulfed the area knocking down everything in its path. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_molasses_disaster

I think my favorite photo is a two-page spread of Symphony Hall as it looked in 1916 at a time when German-born conductor Karl Muck would have been the orchestra's Music Director. The world-famous concert hall looks about the same today (see my 9/25/08 post about Rush Tickets or 10/24/08 BSO Concert Review). In the photo you can clearly see the upper arched windows in the hall which were rediscovered and restored just this year. A trolley car (#733) buzzes by on Mass Ave in the foreground of the photo as a traffic jam consisting of black Model-T Fords drop off their Boston Symphony patrons. The brick building shown standing on the corner of Westland and Mass Ave was an industrial storage facility that no longer exists.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symphony_Hall,_Boston
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Symphony_Orchestra
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Muck

Books such as Historic Photos of Boston allow us to take in the enormous change that naturally occurs in a vibrant and continually-adapting city. Some of these changes are unfortunately regrettable. One observation that strikes me concerns the impact that automobiles have had on city life. You can clearly see that as the number of cars increase over time, the quality of neighborhood life goes down. It's not simply a matter of aesthetics, but about the utilization of space and public mass-transportation. Old cities were not designed by city planners like Charles Bulfinch to accommodate the incredible volume of automobiles that we have on the streets today.

If you want to take a trip back in history to view Boston as it was, I strongly recommend this book. Although you will see that much has changed in the city over the years, we can be proud that many historic buildings and landmarks survive.


You can find the book on Amazon...

http://www.amazon.com/Historic-Photos-Boston-Photos/dp/1596523050/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1226095639&sr=1-1

Historic Photos of Boston
Text and Captions by Timothy Orwig
Copyright 2007 Turner Publishing Company, Nashville TN
ISBN 1-59652-305-0

http://www.turnerpublishinc.com/

-------------